Hi all,
So here is a closer look at Grand Supercycle C of what could be an unfolding running triangle.
This wave count states that 1) Grand Supercycle b completed as a simple zig zag 5-3-5 and 2) Grand Supercycle c is underway as a double-three.
Traditionally, a running flat has a wave count 5-3-5. Wave C appears to be more corrective than impulsive. However, double zigzag can achieve the same quality of progress to that achieved by a regular motive structure, except it just takes more waves.
This count sees an alternation for Supercycle X green, either as a failed zigzag @ 0.618 (preferred subdivision) or as a symmetrical triangle. Either way, it does not effect the location of price: Supercycle Y of Grand Supercycle C.
So here is a closer look at Grand Supercycle C of what could be an unfolding running triangle.
This wave count states that 1) Grand Supercycle b completed as a simple zig zag 5-3-5 and 2) Grand Supercycle c is underway as a double-three.
Traditionally, a running flat has a wave count 5-3-5. Wave C appears to be more corrective than impulsive. However, double zigzag can achieve the same quality of progress to that achieved by a regular motive structure, except it just takes more waves.
This count sees an alternation for Supercycle X green, either as a failed zigzag @ 0.618 (preferred subdivision) or as a symmetrical triangle. Either way, it does not effect the location of price: Supercycle Y of Grand Supercycle C.
